Mills and Skinner conclude issue #32—and their run on
Ravage 2099—by abruptly killing off Ferra and breaking my heart.
ACT 4: IAN EDGINTON, MARCOS TETELLI
The closest thing I've found to an explanation as to why Mills and Skinner left the book after its penultimate issue is in a brief interview with Tony Skinner on doom2009.com:
[Interviewer:] Why did you leave the 2099 books? Particularly Ravage; you and Pat wrote all of the post-Stan Ravage issues except the very last issue. Were you aware that the book was going to be cancelled?
Tony: I didn't write the last one? Ha! Ha! Anyway, it became clear to all involved that the 2099 universe had stopped laying golden eggs. Things wind up fairly swiftly with Marvel when the gravy stops flowing... Reasonable; they are a business like any other. I liked Ravage: he got to say and do some cool shit. There was always lots of other work and those guys have lots of writers. There were no bad feelings that I'm aware of.
So, no...that's not much of an explanation at all. But for whatever reason, Mills and Skinner left the specifics of Ravage's fate up to whomever editor Joey Caliveri selected to replace them on issue #33. (Of his time working on the Marvel 2099 line, Skinner says it was "all just stories for cash," so I doubt he and Mills felt like they were giving away their baby.)
The series' final issue is authored by Ian Edginton—another Brit, whose previous work in the US included the Terminator: The Enemy Within and Aliens: Rogue miniseries published by Dark Horse, an issue of Blade, and some side-stories in a few Marvel 2099 books. Somehow or other, this relatively new writer assigned the task of delivering a one-issue coup de grace to an ongoing series succeeds in giving this clusterfuck of a serial a pitch-perfect and even poignant ending. It's almost certain he was following an outline passed on to him by Caliveri or even Mills and Skinner themselves—but regardless of whose idea it was, Ravage 2099's ending is so bleak and so fucking weird that it probably wouldn't have been allowed to happen in any other book but a Marvel 2099 title, or during any other comics era but the 1990s—and only in a brutal, cynical, circus act of a serial like this one could it actually work.
So: Ferra is dead. The Mindrot alien kills the Eco squadron next. Ravage, Tiana, and a small horde of Mutroids give battle to the monster, but can barely scratch it. Just as their struggle begins to look hopeless, they're saved by Doom ex machina.
The last great idea of Marvel 2099 was the One Nation Under Doom event: not exactly a proper crossover, but a linewide status-quo change that had repercussions for every book. Doom conquers the United States and installs himself as President. He's no believer in democracy—but then again, neither were the megacorporations in control of an effectively defunct federal government. Among his first acts as POTUS are nationalizing Alchemax and the other megacorps, revoking the "black cards" that give the super-rich unlimited credit and access, lifting information controls in cyberspace, permitting public protests (during regular business hours), and dispatching a fleet of environmental maintenance platforms to undo some of the damage wrought by decades of totally unregulated capitalism.
As a more or less benevolent dictator, Doom makes some undeniable improvements to the country, and some of the people who benefit most from his takeover are his former allies from the Fall of the Hammer crossover. Miguel O'Hara gets to sit in the CEO's office at Alchemax. Jake Gallows gets appointed to lead SHIELD. The X-Men get to live in Halo City, a sanctuary for mutants.
Ravage, however, gets the shaft.
With repairing the global ecology high on his list of priorities, Doom turns his attention to Hellrock and judges it beyond any possibility of remediation. Even his environmental maintenance platforms can't clean it up. Its very existence is a liability. It has to go, and so do its inhabitants: a small nation of quasi-human abominations with violent tendencies, faded minds, and toxic biologies are going to be a headache, no matter where they end up. Doom deems it better to euthanize them than risk the outcome of making them refugees.
A gigantic aircraft approaches to inundate the island with liquid adamantium, flash-freeze it, and then fit it with anti-gravity modules to send it (and the remains of its unfortunate denizens) out into space. Like Alchemax, Doom goes big or goes home.
Objecting to Doom's plan, the newly enthroned king of Hellrock faces off against the self-declared President of the United States. Tiana jumps ahead of Ravage and attacks Doom with the full might of her Hela alter-ego. Doom, now having access to all of Alchemax's secrets, knows the failsafe trigger word that shuts down the nanotech powering their engineered Aesir. Hearing it whispered in her ear strips Tiana of both her Hela powers and her status as a Strong and Independent Female Character, reverting her to a Damsel in Distress as she plummets to her death.
The enraged Ravage (somehow) hulks out again, and assails Doom with a mob of angry Mutroids. As he takes a moment to recover from a plasma blast to the face, Ravage makes an impassioned speech on behalf of Hellrock's wretched citizenry, emphasizing the shreds they preserve of their former humanity, even after being turned to monsters by Alchemax's depraved policies. If they're going to die, then they'll die with dignity! They'll go down fighting!
Doom says "ok bye," activates his thrusters, and tells his people to proceed with the adamantium deluge, leaving Ravage and his hideous followers to their demise.
This is it: the superhero comic that pretended for almost three years to have some sort of environmental message to deliver, makes good on that promise at last—and the message is a dire one.
First, some speculation. It seems Mills, Skinner, Caliveri, et al. originally guided Ravage 2099 toward a softer ending. Instead of leaving Ravage and his followers to die, Doom would zap them all into another dimension, where they'd be out of the way but possibly alive (and available for future stories, should the need arise). Maybe that's why Mills and Skinner had the Seeress rig Hellrock to explode: Doom could drop in, announce that the island is approximately forty minutes away from blowing up and poisoning the entire planet, and send Ravage and the Mutroids into Dimension X before proceeding to encase the giant dirty bomb in unbreakable metal and fling it into space. Maybe Ravage would feel a mite sore about being cast into interdimensional exile, but given the urgency of preventing an imminent global catastrophe, he'd have to admit that Doom had few options and not much time to act, and in the final analysis he'd probably rather be a banished king than a dead chump.
Instead, the writers and/or editors opted to take the ending down a darker route (and possibly at the very last minute), which necessitated waving away the Seeress' countdown with the explanation that Doom repaired the ion induction field generator before facing Ravage.
The fly in the ointment of environmentalist politics, thirty years ago and today, is that for all the seriousness of climate change, ocean acidification, deforestation, etc., most of us (unless we're living on the Maldives) can only reckon with the problem on an intellectual level. Our political leaders, scientists, and the media can repeat as many times as they'd like that civilization is likely to collapse if the average temperature of the plant increases by more than three degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, but so long as the majority of people aren't having their lives upended by events with a clear and immediate connection to anthropogenic climate change—which would mean being able to look out their window and see climate change looming in the horizon and swallowing up the city or countryside like The Nothing in The NeverEnding Story—they're not likely to change their habits or collectively mobilize on their own. It's the old "frog in a slowly heating pot" scenario.
As originally planned, Ravage 2099's ending gives the allegorical environmental time bomb a palpable urgency it simply lacks in the real world. If the media reported irrefutable evidence that the oceans would all rise by ten feet the instant oil began flowing through the Keystone XL pipeline, there'd be no debate or dithering about its construction. The thing would be shut down within twenty four hours.
But that's not how the ecological crisis is playing out, and Ravage 2099's writers and editors wisely made its ultimate threat one whose solution could theoretically be deferred till later. Hellrock is contained now, and if Alchemax were still running the show, that would be enough.
But who knows when the situation might change? What if the ion induction engine fails on its own? What if another rogue actor tries to weaponize it and succeeds? What if a natural disaster puts it out of commission, or an active volcano erupts beneath it? What if the island somehow comes to life and goes on a rampage like Godzilla? (Anything can happen in a comic book, after all.)
Practical environmental policy must be proactive instead of reactive, and decades of characterization have established Doom as nothing if not practical and proactive.
Look: I'd be thrilled if the United States enacted the sweeping legislation of a Green New Deal. I'd be beside myself if an international schedule for carbon and methane emissions reduction was observed and enforced. My number one hope for American politics is for the ecological crisis to start to be treated as a crisis. But I have no illusions about the incapability of our current political milieu to take the drastic action that needs to be taken—and I'm also aware that drastic action, should we somehow agree to take it, won't be easy or fun.
Let's imagine that our political establishment, as it currently exists, determines to act. And let's be realistic about it. Something happens, some undeniable and visceral mass experience of an approaching tipping point has made everyone as ready for radical environmental legislation as we were for an invasion against Iraq in 2002–3. Fox News and the New York Times are in agreement. Dissenters are ignored or deplatformed. Even Senate Republicans are too scared to vote nay.
Being realistic means acknowledging that sacrifices are going to have to be made. Doing this right entails restructuring the economy, regulating or outlawing a slew of products and services, renovating infrastructure locally and nationally, and so on.
It also means accepting that these changes are going to screw people over. Not everyone, of course—after all, any such initiative will be predicated on the understanding that none of us are safe if we allow society to be convulsed by the runaway effects of climate change. But there will be people, and maybe not very many, whose lives are disrupted and made measurably worse by the reorganization. And if we're being realistic, it ain't gonna be the scumbags who made billions of dollars creating and aggravating the problem in the first place. (Not without a coup d'état or armed revolution, and we've already said that this is happening under the current political order.) It will most likely be some group that's at or near the bottom of the totem pole that gets the worst of it. For instance, not everybody who earns their living mining coal, working on oil rigs or in refineries, or pumping gas is going to be gently ushered into a new career installing solar panels where they earn a better wage than before.
Sure, the undiluted pitch for the Green New Deal promises to take care of them. Call me cynical, but I'd expect that a lot of unemployed workers in Appalachia, the Gulf States, North Dakota, etc. would be advised to "learn to code," encouraged to take advantage of low-interest loans for boot camp tuition, and then left to fend for themselves in the labor market. Not that pinioning the fossil fuel industry isn't in everyone's best interest in the grand scheme of things—but that would be cold comfort for the laid-off oil rig roustabout who gets put on a waitlist for a job building wind turbines two states away from where his family lives.
I'm aware that I'm catastrophizing here; my point is not everybody would be thrilled about what the transition entailed for them personally. And since any Green New Deal is clearly a political impossibility right now, it's all hypothetical and moot.
Under a dictatorship like Doom's, maybe the pain would be distributed more equitably in terms of culpability for creating the problem—say, by expropriating the wealth of the billionaire class that got us into this mess, and using it to subsidize the infrastructure investment that would provide work and wages for those whose jobs were obsolesced by divestment in fossil fuels. But some of the losers would still be selected from the bottom. Even an apologist for the USSR or the PRC—and I wouldn't necessarily call anyone insane for being one—must concede that those nations' economic and social revolutions immiserated and killed a whole lot of the people that communism was intended to help.
But that's the reality principle. That's progress. That's problem-solving on the national scale. That's omelettes and broken eggs.
This, at last, is Ravage 2099's bleak environmental message: doing what's necessary to resolve the crisis means being prepared to accept responsibility for the sacrifices that other people will be demanded to make of themselves. Somebody is going to have to be comfortable with confronting some part of the world as an unyielding tyrant, even as they serve the rest as their wise and forward-thinking steward. To believe otherwise is naïve utopianism.
Or maybe I'm reading too much into it. Who knows?
In any event: in the end, all Ravage can do is impotently scream at Doom until he's swallowed up in a flood of molten metal.
Hmmm. Maybe the Barrio Man misread his own prophecy. Maybe the Valley of the Beasts was actually the blighted dells of Hellrock. The prophecy said Ravage would discover the meaning of humanity, and, well, Ravage certainly did learn a thing or two about humanity today.
And that's the end of Paul-Philip Ravage. If you can think of a starring-role comic book hero whose final words before his death were less dignified than "dooulp plup glup," I'd certainly like to know.
Ravage 2099 slyly communicates the last tragic couplet of its final act in a language that only readers of the Marvel 2099 line would be fluent. Notice the Shakespeare quotation at the bottom left of the image below. When John Francis Moore debuted Doom 2099, he concluded the first issue with the famous opening lines of Shakespeare's Henry V. He continued to close out every subsequent issue with a pertinent quote from the classics, and Warren Ellis observed the custom after Moore passed him the authorial baton. It's the veritable signature of a Doom 2099 installment.
Underscoring the totality of its titular hero's destruction at Doom's hands, Ravage 2099 essentially ends as an issue of Doom 2099. Doom didn't just humiliate and murder Ravage in the name of ecological restoration: he conquered and subsumed his book. The effect is surprisingly brutal, and I wouldn't have expected that a comic that's proven time and time again how dumb it can be should end on such a grim and eloquent coda.
Well, Ravage seemed like as big a trainwreck as you can get but, at the same time at the very least they had the guts to end it on that note and not just keep a never ending status quo...( Glances at most DC and Marvel Comic leads at the moment. ) And for all that...STILL does not seem as grim a finale as that whole Ultimate's Ultimatum lol.
ReplyDeleteAs for the stakes with what it will take at the moment to advert climate Armageddon ...its quite depressing seeing that to many are either to greedy or to lazy to make even the most sightist effort, but after seeing how many have gone ballistic just over measures to fight the Pandemic...its become quite clear it would take a real Justice Leauge forcing humanity to take the measures to ever take it off.
If to many refuse to take action on the Mega rich now because they still think most billionaires are all but gods that should not be defied...it really does look like it will take till the world is going through one of those disaster movies before enough unite and " Asgard" is stormed...sigh.
I enjoyed reading this overview of Ravage 2099. To me, the initial arc of the series sounds more interesting than the bizarre narrative changes that you describe in your second and third posts. The bleak ending, however, is far beyond what I'd expect to see in a Marvel comic, and I'm amazed that got published.
ReplyDeleteI've long been interested in Marvel's comics, but I've never been able to get very invested in them (or most Western comics aside from some classics like Watchmen and Sandman). I read a few of the Chris Claremont era X-Men comics, which I liked but not as much as I enjoyed the 90s X-Men cartoon I grew up with. The ever-changing authors and artists is very distracting to me, as I'm more accustomed to manga, where the author and artist are usually the same person (and often only change if someone literally dies).